ARBITRAL AWARD BY SINGLE ARBITRATOR DETERMINING CROSS-CLAIMS AND ORDERING PAYMENT OF SUM BY ONE PARTY TO OTHER

Non-Judicial Stamp Paper is required for this contract to be sworn before a First Class Magistrate or a Notary in the State. Check stamp duty charges in another state: Select state
Andaman & Nicobar Islands
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Dadra & Nagar Haveli
Daman & Diu
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Lakshdweep
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Other Territory
Puducherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal

Stamp paper is not included with this agreement and is for illustration purposes only. If e -stamp is applicable in your city you can order it during checkout.

GUIDELINE

Guideline for Drafting Arbitral Award by Single Arbitrator Determining Cross:

This document is employed in arbitration proceedings where a single arbitrator is tasked with determining cross-claims between parties. Here's a concise guide for drafting this award:

Title and Identification: Clearly title the document as "Arbitral Award by Single Arbitrator Determining Cross-Claims." Include names of parties, the arbitrator, and the case reference.

Background and Reference: Provide a brief background of the arbitration and reference relevant cross-claims, establishing the context for the arbitrator's decision.

Legal Framework: Establish the legal framework governing the arbitration process, citing applicable arbitration rules and laws.

Arbitral Findings: Clearly outline the arbitrator's findings on the cross-claims, addressing each claim individually and providing a rationale for the decision.

Execution and Signatures: Include spaces for the arbitrator's signature, confirming the acceptance and understanding of the award.

Common Mistakes to Avoid:

Inadequate Background Information: Ensure a comprehensive summary of the arbitration and cross-claims, enabling a clear understanding of the arbitrator's decision.

Failure to Apply Legal Framework: Clearly articulate how the legal framework and relevant laws are applied in determining the validity of cross-claims.

Ambiguous Findings: Use precise language in presenting findings to avoid ambiguity that may lead to misinterpretation.

Neglecting Evidence: Consider all relevant evidence presented during the arbitration process to make informed findings on cross-claims.

Lack of Clarity in Rationale: Clearly state the rationale behind the arbitrator's decision on each cross-claim, providing transparency in the decision-making process.

By following these guidelines and avoiding common mistakes, a well-drafted Arbitral Award by Single Arbitrator Determining Cross-Claims ensures a legally sound resolution to disputes arising from cross-claims in arbitration proceedings, often used in commercial and contractual disputes.

Share This Document :